Tuesday, April 25, 2006
Steven Harper Doesn't Like Coffins
In this morning's news I heard that Steven Harper and the Conservative government have decided to ban the media from being present when the bodies of four killed Canadian soldiers arrive home at CFB Trenton.
Defense Minister Gordon O'Connor claims it's because the event should be a private matter for the army and the families of the deceased.
Bullshit.
I don't want to offend any of the family members of the four soldiers killed, but this kind of decision by our government really ticks me off. If anything, the returning of the soldiers should be publicized. Canadians should see those flag-draped coffins coming back, they should think about those dead soldiers, those broken families and why we've got kids over on the other side of the planet dying. And more are coming, you can be sure of that.
Hiding behind the privacy of the families is cheap. Now, if the families come out and say they wanted it to be a private affair, fine, I can understand that. But it seems to me, if I had a family member die in the line of duty I'd want it publicized. I'd want people to know why my family member died, what that person believed in, why they were fighting...I'd want the support and understanding of Canadians, not privacy. I would grieve privately, as we all do for our lost loved ones, but I'd want Canadians to sit there and watch.
In my opinion, Steven Harper is playing a dangerous game. He's clearly a control freak, evident by the way he collars his ministers and keeps them quiet. It sounds like a great idea in principle; control every single thing that's done and said, but it's a losing battle. The media will get to his people eventually, they will go after him and the weakest links in his government, and you can't rule with an iron fist forever. Eventually cracks will appear, they will grow into crevasses, and the foundation ultimately crumbles.
Steven Harper doesn't like coffins. Who does? But I don't think he has any right to hide an event like this, to gloss over it is demeaning to the soldiers, who are ultimately public servants. I'm sure they would want the entire country to know them and see them return.
In case Steven Harper or anyone else has forgotten, the soldiers are:
* Corporal Matthew Dinning
* Bombardier Myles Mansell
* Corporal Randy Payne
* Lieutenant William Turner
Whether you believe in war or not, or the situation in Afghanistan or not, doesn't matter. What matters is that four soldiers who dedicated themselves to our country were killed and the government is trying to make that seem lighter, less important and less meaningful than it really is.
No good, Steven Harper. Just plain no good.
Read: Ottawa fails fallen soldiers, critics say
(Technorati Tags: steven harper, four dead soldiers, conservative government)
Post a Comment
Comments:
well for a difference of opinion on this...
the people that show up for these things tend to be one of two varieties, those that are respectful and appreciative of the life of a soldier, and as such are there already, and those that are trying to exploit the death for one subject or another.
The death of a soldier is not a media event.
the people that show up for these things tend to be one of two varieties, those that are respectful and appreciative of the life of a soldier, and as such are there already, and those that are trying to exploit the death for one subject or another.
The death of a soldier is not a media event.
I appreciate the difference of opinion - imagine this blog becoming a place of intelligent discussion vs. my drivel on weird and silly injuries!
I would agree that the death of a soldier should not be sensationalized, but at the same time, soldiers are public servants and therefore the public has a right to information. And the media is there to ask questions - many of which Canadians are just now struggling with (whereas Americans have had the issues to talk about for a lot longer).
Plus, I don't look at this event in a silo -- if Harper's government was open to the media on everything else, and it seemed like there was true sincerity behind wanting to keep this issue private, so be it, but in the context of how the government is being operated, you have to expect that this is nothing more than a silly cover-up attempt and not a way of respecting those soldiers.
I would agree that the death of a soldier should not be sensationalized, but at the same time, soldiers are public servants and therefore the public has a right to information. And the media is there to ask questions - many of which Canadians are just now struggling with (whereas Americans have had the issues to talk about for a lot longer).
Plus, I don't look at this event in a silo -- if Harper's government was open to the media on everything else, and it seemed like there was true sincerity behind wanting to keep this issue private, so be it, but in the context of how the government is being operated, you have to expect that this is nothing more than a silly cover-up attempt and not a way of respecting those soldiers.
Well I can't speak for Canadians, but the disconnect in the states between military members and the media is complete, total, and unreal (I'm former 10 year Air Force). To the point that I completely do not trust them, and would deny them any access they requested to my family just on principle, and that is a fairly common feeling here. Since the media in Canada is generally a little to the left of the one here I think, it probably holds there as well.
Post a Comment
Save post: reddit | del.ici.ous
Links to this post:
<< Home

